Outline
Thesis:
Genetically modified foods have gained proliferating popularity but has there
been enough extensive research conducted to consider them safe for consumption?
1. Introduction
A. Are feeds made from genetically modified
foods entering the livestock we eat?
B. Genetically modified foods have been a
contributing factor in the disappearance of bees and butterflies
C. If claims about genetically modified
organisms are well intended, then if this is true how come there is a plethora
of money spend on preventive labeling in the United States?
D. Is genetic engineering a useful tool for
sustainable agriculture?
2. Historical Background
A. What environmental and social aspects
brought genetically modified organisms to the table in the first?
B. What was the main motive behind GMO’s and
was there any other viable options or routes we could have taken to solve the
problem?
C. Congressional background on the laws
passed.
3. Definition of Topic
A. GM crops versus breeding or marker
assisted selection.
B. What properties makeup GM crops and how
do they differ from traditional crops?
C. What are the agriculture pro and cons of
GM crops?
D. How do GM crops affect overall health?
E. How does this affect our local community
here in Minnesota?
4. Proposed action for solving the problem
A. Potentially for other ways of
agricultural means and research. (Marker Assisted Selection)
B. Social movements towards companies that
support Non-GMO; building organizations that underpin the public's notions and
beliefs on GMOs.
C. Support local community farms
5. Conclusion
A. Drawbacks that come with GMOs must be
considered and weighed against their benefits.
B. What and how extensive has the research
been on genetically modified crops.
C. Health concerns from eating GM crops.
Bibliography
"Introduction
to Genetically Modified Food: At Issue." Genetically Modified Food, edited
by Tamara Thompson, Greenhaven Press,
2015.
The
introduction to GMF: At Issue has a non-bias view on genetically modified foods
and takes both sides of the facts while maintaining well laid out sources of
information. The material covers both the biotechnology behind the process of
GM crops and the social standing on Gm crops in the United States.
Bakshi, A.
(2003). Potential adverse health effects of genetically modified crops. Journal
of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 6, 211-225.
This is a short
article that gives a deep contrast on the topic of genetically modified crops
and their potential to either help or harm society. It goes over various topics
of well thought out questions that one should be concerned about while
researching this topic. For example, he talks about how GM crops might be
enhanced with heavier toxins due to the genetic process than non-genetically
modified foods. While introducing the potential behind them by claiming how
they could eliminate hunger and starvation in millions of people. Overall for
how short the article is it has a well laid out contrast to the debate as to
whether genetically modified food is safe for consumption.
Bernstein
J.A., Bernstein I.L., Bucchini L., Goldman L.R., Hamilton R.G., Lehrer S.,
Rubin C., and Sampson H.A. (2003). Clinical and laboratory investigation of
allergy to genetically modified foods. Environmental Health Perspectives,
111(8), 1114-1121.
The article
talks about the clinical and laboratory investigations of allergens to
genetically modified foods. In depth, it talks about the first corn to be grown
genetically in the united states under a company called StarLink and used
different protein structures that are more resilient than traditional corn
crops. However, signs of the allergic reaction showed up on some of the workers
dealing with these new strains; leading the CDC to convey tests and other
governmental validations. Mainly the article has a non-bias view on genetically
modified foods by showing the extensive research done on GM crops while
portraying potential side effects that they had to people in the agriculture
workforce.
Weeks,
Jennifer. "Global Population Growth." CQ Researcher 16 Jan. 2015:
49-72.
In “Can the
planet support another 4 billion people?” by Weeks has vast amounts of
information not only on GM crops but also Acknowledges the counterparts of the
various problem. For example, she states that Johnathan Foley, director of the
institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota claims that GM
crops could be intended to help solve world hunger issues. However, the biotech
companies should be focused on third-world corps not just what we eat here in
the states. While stating that the
critics have other viable solution such as marker assisted selection techniques.
"MAS,
What Is It? Marker Assisted Selection." MAS, What Is It? Marker Assisted
Selection. N.p., 2013.
The article
goes over the different aspects of marker assisted selection and GM crops.